[RMCProfile-users] RMCPROFILE
Chris Kerr
cjk34 at cam.ac.uk
Mon Apr 28 09:48:11 BST 2014
If you are getting the wrong number of correlations in the restraint file, using different
distance windows for creating the restraint files than for the RMCprofile fit itself. You will
then have to enable MOVEOUT.
On Tuesday 22 Apr 2014 15:07:16 或许可以 wrote:
> Dear author ,
>
>
> I 'm working with local atomic arrangement in disorder materials.
> When I study the RMCProfile software, I have some questions so need your
> help.
>
> In the SF6 example, I can get better results after studying the
> manual. But for the rmcsf6.dat file, I have some questions on the keyword
> of "NEUTRON_REAL(or RECIPROCAL)_SPACE_DATA". If I have X-ray diffraction
> data, I will modify "NEUTRON" to "XRAY", but there will be some errors; but
> if I modify "NEUTRON" to "X", then it will success, but there is no
> important "rmcsf6_PDF1.csv" and "rmcsf6_SQ1.csv" files in the makefiles. I
> don't know the reason.
>
> Another question is restraint files. In the SF6 example, a S atom is
> adjacent with six O atoms and a O atom is adjacent with one S atom, because
> SF6 is unlinked octahedral material. When I research SiO2, SiO2 is linked
> tetrahedral material, so there exists boundary problem. In principle, a Si
> atom is adjacent with five O atoms and a O atom is adjacent with two Si
> atom. But when I use neighbour_list.exe to create restraint files, SiO2.sio
> is:
64
> 1 1 65
> 2 2 66 80
> 3 2 67 73
> 4 2 68 79
> 5 4 67 69 76 78
> 6 4 65 73 79 80
> 7 4 66 71 72 77
> 8 4 68 70 74 75
> 9 1 81
> 10 4 69 74 82 96
> 11 2 83 89
> 12 2 84 95
> 13 4 83 85 92 94
> 14 4 81 89 95 96
> 15 4 82 87 88 93
> 16 4 84 86 90 91
> 17 1 97
> 18 2 98 112
> 19 4 71 75 99 105
> 20 2 100 111
> 21 4 99 101 108 110
> 22 4 97 105 111 112
> 23 4 98 103 104 109
> 24 4 100 102 106 107
> 25 2 70 113
> 26 4 101 106 114 128
> 27 4 87 91 115 121
> 28 2 116 127
> 29 4 115 117 124 126
> 30 4 113 121 127 128
> 31 4 114 119 120 125
>
>
>
> But there is error when I run the RMCProfile. I artificially change
> SiO2.sio file to SF6-like restraint files, there is no error. I don't know
> the reasons.This is modified file:
64
> 1 4 65 74 79 85
> 2 4 66 80 87 92
> 3 4 67 73 78 86
> 4 4 68 79 81 91
> 5 4 67 69 76 78
> 6 4 65 73 79 80
> 7 4 66 71 72 77
> 8 4 68 70 74 75
> 9 4 81 88 93 99
> 10 4 69 74 82 96
> 11 4 83 89 98 116
> 12 4 84 95 97 102
> 13 4 83 85 92 94
> 14 4 81 89 95 96
> 15 4 82 87 88 93
> 16 4 84 86 90 91
> 17 4 97 99 105 116
> 18 4 98 112 128 134
> 19 4 71 75 99 105
> 20 4 100 111 147 158
> 21 4 99 101 108 110
> 22 4 97 105 111 112
> 23 4 98 103 104 109
> 24 4 100 102 106 107
> 25 4 70 113 139 178
> 26 4 101 106 114 128
> 27 4 87 91 115 121
> 28 4 116 127 178 175
> 29 4 115 117 124 126
> 30 4 113 121 127 128
> 31 4 114 119 120 125
>
>
>
> I know my expression have some questions, so I'm very sorry and hope you
> forgive me. Thank you very much!
>
> Best wish!
>
>
> H.Wu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rmcprofile.org/pipermail/rmcprofile-users/attachments/20140428/a1fe63f8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.rmcprofile.org/pipermail/rmcprofile-users/attachments/20140428/a1fe63f8/attachment.sig>
More information about the rmcprofile-users
mailing list