[RMCProfile-users] Weighting of data sets
Henrik Mauroy
hmauroy at gmail.com
Tue Jun 3 19:24:03 BST 2014
Hi everyone.
This might be a dumb question but I wonder how the weighting of the data
sets are done. So far I've used equal weighting for G(r), F(Q) and Bragg
and haven't been troubled by this yet.
I have some data collected at GEM where the Bragg data is completely
impossible to fit due to a unusually weak Bragg signal (due to
cancelling negative scattering lengths), and need to turn the weighting
of the Bragg data to such a low number that it is not being part of the
fitting.
1) What effect does a higher number for the weight do?
2) In what range should the weight-number be? In most examples it is
smaller than 0.1, but can you use bigger or smaller numbers?
3) I see from experimenting with high and low numbers that the chi^2
value calculated for the data set in question becomes larger for a lower
weighting. Is this the number RMCProfile is trying to reduce?
Thanks for any answer!
Cheers,
Henrik
More information about the rmcprofile-users
mailing list