[RMCProfile-users] (no subject)

[helen.playford at stfc.ac.uk]

Hi Giorgia,

For (1) it's theoretically possible, but not a good idea as the F(Q) and G(r) datasets should be directly related to each other. Can you tell us why you are wanting to do this?

For (2) this shouldn't be a problem, you just need to put Atom A in twice (the program won't care if your atom list goes Fe Fe O, for example, it will just treat the two Fe atoms separately). How are you making your configurations at the moment? 

Once you have one with two different Atom A sites you can then apply whichever constraints you need to either of them. Hope that makes sense!

Best wishes,
Helen

-----Original Message-----
From: rmcprofile-users [mailto:rmcprofile-users-bounces at rmcprofile.org] On Behalf Of Giorgia Confalonieri
Sent: 07 September 2015 09:24
To: rmcprofile-users at rmcprofile.org
Subject: [RMCProfile-users] (no subject)


Hieverybody  

I'd like toask you some information: 

1) 1)   Is it possible to use different max qQ Qmax for diffraction data andg(r), maybe specifying in .dat file? 

2) 2)   I have the same atom distributed indifferent crystallographic sites, it is possible to move just a part of these? Letme explain: I have some Atoms A "linked" to Atoms B and some Atoms A "linked"to Atoms C, I'd like to use different constraints for the two group A. How can Ido? 

Thank you 
Giorgia

****************
Per destinare il 5x1000 all'Universita' degli Studi di Milano: indicare nella dichiarazione dei redditi il codice fiscale 80012650158.

http://www.unimi.it/13084.htm?utm_source=firmaMail&utm_medium=email&utm_content=linkFirmaEmail&utm_campaign=5xmille

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rmcprofile.org/pipermail/rmcprofile-users/attachments/20150907/b0ab0a88/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
rmcprofile-users mailing list
rmcprofile-users at rmcprofile.org
http://lists.rmcprofile.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcprofile-users